The Basic Principles Of separate corporate identity pakistan case law
The Basic Principles Of separate corporate identity pakistan case law
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees apply.
However, decisions rendered through the Supreme Court on the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues with the Constitution and federal law.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is proven along with the employee is found guilty after due process of law, it is the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, outside of the different penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct is not adequate even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful method. Read more
Most of the volumes (which include more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are accessible online through the Caselaw Access Project.
PLR is a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
A lot of judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name over the ECL based over the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It's also a very well-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives with the police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, ensure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair towards the offender and also the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation within the police, plus they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its many pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect instead of abduct. Read more
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
8. To the reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition to generally be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is thus acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more
Criminal cases From the common law tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their here individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduce courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.